MORE PHOTOS: NEXT (Not recommended for children and people with heart problems).

Back ] Home ] Next ] CONTINUES ON THE NEXT PAGE.  Return to "In-Depth Articles"

Get $25 FREE-No Purchase required!

TERRORISM AND THE RIGHT TO EXIST

THE ARAB/PALESTINIAN/ISLAMIC POINT OF VIEW. THE ISRAELI/JEWISH POINT OF VIEW. PUBLISHED UNEDITED "AS IS".

We have reprinted the articles and commentaries as originally written by Arab, Muslims, Israelis and Jewish writers and journalists. No part of the printed material has been edited, in order to preserve the authenticity of the original work of the authors. Their statements do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and points of view of our agency. And this includes the photos provided by both camps and various news agencies, along with photos captions accompanying the artwork and pictures provided by the party concerned. Judge for yourself.

 
 READ ALSO: FACES OF JIHAD.. Read Full Article

 

Photo: American Nick Berg beheaded by Al Zarqawi Terrorist group.

 

 

THE ARAB/PALESTINIAN/ISLAMIC POINT OF VIEW. What they say, write, publish and argue about.

___________________________________________________________________

TV Program on the Culture of Martyrdom and Suicide Bombers on Al-Arabiya, August 25, 2005. The following are excerpts from a show about the culture of martyrdom, which aired on Al-Arabiya TV. Reporter: "The martyrdom-seeking campaign by Hamas and Islamic Jihad may have come as a response to the Hebron massacre, but the ideological basis of this campaign is deeply rooted in Hamas' declaration of Jihad against Israel. "These films were not intended to be broadcast. Hamas made them for internal use, and they provide a rare perspective on the movement's efforts to teach its principles to new recruits." Children singing: "Rejoice, oh Bitah, cheer in merriment, oh Nujud, our occupied homeland will be restored through Jihad." Crowd: "Allah Akbar. Allah Akbar. Allah Akbar."
Male voice on loudspeaker: "What is your goal?" Crowd: "Allah." Male voice on loudspeaker: "What is your constitution?" Crowd: "The Koran." Male voice on loudspeaker: "Who is your leader?" Crowd: "The Prophet Muhammad." Male voice on loudspeaker: "What is your path?" Crowd: "Jihad." Male voice on loudspeaker: "What is your greatest desire?" Crowd: "Death for the sake of Allah." Reporter: "If Jihad is the goal, the self-sacrifice operations against the Israelis were the weapon chosen in the mid-nineties. In a series of operations, Hamas and Islamic Jihad hit the major Israeli cities and caused the deaths of dozens. This was part of the strategy."

Sheik Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi: "These operations do not target civilians. The Israeli society is a military society. It is well known that they have militarized their society. All Israeli society, its men and its women..."
Reporter: "Hamas' strategy of targeting Israelis has gained the support of must Muslim clerics, to the point that Sheik Al-Qaradhawi appeared on Al-Jazeera TV and issued a fatwa permitting the killing of Israelis in these operations."
Sheik Al-Qaradhawi: "...as I said, when a brother blows himself up today... The brother who blows himself up at the bus station, where all the soldiers who come back are gathering... He does not intend to kill a child or anything, but rather tries to kill people who are soldiers - either soldiers on active duty or soldiers on reserve duty."
Reporter: "Indeed, prominent scholars have described suicide operations for the sake of the homeland as martyrdom operations."
Sheik Muhammad Hussein Fadhlallah: "The martyrdom operations are a part of the war movement, since the issue of war differs from the issue of suicide. Suicide is the killing of oneself for personal reasons. On the other hand, the martyrdom operation means that a person dies for a greater cause."
Reporter: "The culture of Hizbullah is the culture of martyrdom, with which it nurtures the minds of others. Every year, Hizbullah celebrates Martyr's Day. On Hizbullah's Al-Manar TV we see actors playing the role of scared Israelis and Americans who are banished from the Middle East."
Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah: "These martyrdom operations are the shortest way to Allah. They are the must exalted and magnificent way of martyrdom in our generation. The martyrdom operation is the weapon Allah gave this nation, and no one can take it from us. They can take away our cannons, our tanks, and our planes, but they cannot take away our spirit, which yearns for Allah and which is determined to achieve martyrdom."
Reporter: "Salah Ghandour a soldier in Hizbullah's martyrdom army..."
Maha Ghandour, Salah Ghandour's widow: "I met Salah in 1990 and we got engaged seven months later. We were married in 1991, early 1991. Even in his final days he stayed at home with us and told me: 'Say goodbye to me. I am bidding this world farewell.' From when I just married him, I expected his martyrdom at any minute. When we had three children I told him that he was taking his time. I didn't expect to live with him for five years."
Interviewer: "Was it important to you that he worked for the resistance?"
Maha Ghandour: "Of course. Of course. If we had not defended our land, who would have liberated it? Unless women sacrificed their husbands and brothers, this land would never have been liberated. Praise Allah, our homeland was liberated by the blood of the martyrs and the efforts of the mujahideen, some of which are fighting the Jihad to this day."
Reporter: "Hizbullah filmed Salah's operation and final message, and the entire program was aired on Al-Manar TV, which belongs to Hizbullah."
Salah Ghandour's son: "This is the operation that daddy carried out. This is the convoy that came from here, from Palestine. This is his operation..."
Salah Ghandour's daughter: "This is the place of the operation in which he was gone."
Salah Ghandour's son: "This is the car daddy blew up."
Maha Ghandour: "Of course I miss him and remember his words. Sometimes it saddens me, but I love to watch him." Sources: Al-Manar TV, IMRA, MEMRI, International Herald Daily News., Al-Arabiya

English Speaking Al-Qaeda Terrorist: Oh People of the West.... It IsTime for Us to Be Equals – As You Kill Us, You Will be Killed.

 Windows Media Player

The following are excerpts from an Al-Qaeda tape featuring a Western Al-Qaeda terrorist, which aired on Al-Arabiya TV on August 9, 2005. Al-Arabiya claims he is Irish.

Terrorist: Oh people of the West, don't be fooled by the lies of Blair and Bush that you are free nations, for the only freedom that you have is the freedom to be slaves of your whims and desires. Your children are free to be deprived of their childhood and their innocence. Your women are free to be used as tools of business and entertainment, and all of you as a whole are the slaves of con men and women who rule you. They are your real enemies. If you only knew – they are the ones who drag your countries to the pit of America's group of scavengers, who seek to ravage the entire globe for the interests of a handful of gangsters and corporate companies. Democracy, human rights, and freedom are all but hollow illusions, with which they tranquilize inhabitants of the human farms which they control. The Muslim world is not your backyard. The Muslim world is not Germany, Japan, or South America. The honorable sons and daughters of Islam will not sit down, watching you spread your evil and immorality and infidelity to our land. The honorable sons of Islam will not just let you kill our families in Palestine, Afghanistan, Kashmir, the Balkans, Indonesia, the Caucuses, and elsewhere. It is time for us to be equals – as you kill us, you will be killed, as you bomb us, you will be bombed.  Source: Memri.

Egyptian Professor Abd Al-Sabour Shahin: Muslims Had Nothing to Do with 9/11 Attack on the Empire State Building

Windows Media Player

The following are excerpts from an interview with Egyptian professor Abd Al-Sabour Shahin, which aired on Saudi Channel 1 on August 8, 2005.

Shahin: I believe a dirty Zionist hand carried out this act. Zionism has taken the opportunity to escalate the war in Palestine, killing hundreds of thousands so far, while we watch from the sidelines in astonishment and ask: What's going on ?

Our enemies weave many lies about us, which we are not necessarily aware of. For example: One day, we awoke to the crime of 9/11, which hit the tallest buildings in New York, the Empire State Building (sic). There is no doubt that not a single Arab or Muslim had anything to do with these events. The incident was fabricated as a pretext to attack Islam and Muslims. The plan was to take over the world's energy sources, and to achieve this control by force and not by agreement or negotiations, by interests, free trade, or anything like that. This is what they wanted. So this incident was fabricated - and Allah knows that the Arabs and Muslims are innocent of it - in order to serve as a pretext to attack Islam and the Muslims. All of a sudden, after we were used to consider America to be a rational and balanced country... All of a sudden, it violates international conventions, cancels treaties, ignores the U.N., acts on its own accord, attacks nations, kills innocent people, and claims it has the right to do so - and all this is based on lies. These were lies from beginning to end, and we were not used to lying - not in policy, not in our discourse, and not in the media. Imagine what crisis the Arab and Islam nation finds itself in, in the midst of these peculiar events, which we cannot explain or believe. All of a sudden, we were framed for an international crime, on the basis of lies. Source: Memri.

Hamas Radio:  Jaffa is the same as Gaza, Tel Aviv the same as Rafah.

An Interview with Hamas Leader Dr. Mahmoud Al-Zahar

"We do not and will not recognize a state called Israel. "..."Israel has no right to any inch of Palestinian land. This is an important issue. Our position stems from our religious convictions. This is a holy land. It is not the property of the Palestinians or the Arabs. This land is the property of all Muslims in all parts of the world. We regard the Gaza Strip, Jerusalem, and the West Bank as a geographical unit, as mentioned by resolutions 242 and 338, which have not been implemented. We are currently talking about this area.".


The following are excerpts from an interview with Hamas leader Mahmoud Al-Zahar that appeared in Asharq Al-Awsat on August 18, 2005.
The following are the excepts from the interview(1): What Next in Gaza

Q: "Will Hamas continue the resistance after the disengagement plan is implemented?"

A: "Our plan is not to liberate the Gaza Strip, nor is it to liberate the West Bank or to liberate Jerusalem. Our plan in the first stage is to liberate the lands occupied in 1967. Those who view it as a strategic solution and those who view it as an interim solution have agreed upon this plan. Therefore, we will not take over the Gaza Strip and live there peacefully while the Zionist enemy is detaining thousands of our sons and occupying the West Bank. The resistance must move to the West Bank to expel the occupation."

Q: "Will the calming down [Tahdiah] end with the completion of the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip?"

A: "The tahdiah is scheduled to finish at the end of 2005. It was contingent on the release of the prisoners and stopping the attacks. Israel has not abided by these conditions. Our goal was not to hit Israel for the sake of hitting Israel , but to attack the occupation. I stress that the resistance was what drove the occupation out of the Gaza Strip."

Q: "Will Hamas resume its operations in Israeli towns after the withdrawal?"

A: "Firstly, there are no Israeli towns. These are settlements. If the aggression and occupation continue, the Palestinian people will have no alternative but to defend themselves. The Palestinian people are not killing the occupiers or being killed out of fun or madness. The life spent by our generation in killing, imprisonment, and exile is not the life that we want for our sons. We want them to live in security and peace and to live in a homeland in which they are able to move and not to live as slaves of the Israeli enemy."

Q:  "In other words, the resistance of Hamas in the future will be in response to Israeli actions."

A: "No, our position depends on two things: the withdrawal from the Palestinian territories and the extent of the aggression against the Palestinian people." Our Position Stems from Our Religious Convictions

Q:  "You talk about attacks on the Palestinian territories as if you recognize the existence of Israel."

A: "I strongly disagree with your statement. We do not and will not recognize a state called Israel. Israel has no right to any inch of Palestinian land. This is an important issue. Our position stems from our religious convictions. This is a holy land. It is not the property of the Palestinians or the Arabs. This land is the property of all Muslims in all parts of the world. We regard the Gaza Strip, Jerusalem, and the West Bank as a geographical unit, as mentioned by resolutions 242 and 338, which have not been implemented. We are currently talking about this area."


PA-Hamas Reactions

Q:  "Let us talk about the relationship between Hamas and the Palestinian authority. Has there been friction recently?"

A: "When Mahmoud Abbas (Abu-Mazen) was elected, we started talks. Some people in Fatah and the Palestinian authority told Abu-Mazen that he was giving Hamas more than it deserved at the expense of Fatah, and that his policy was leading to the destruction of Fatah, as proven by the success of Hamas in the first and second rounds of the municipal elections. They claimed that we fixed the elections. This was a joke, because no opposition has been able to rig elections. "Some officials of the Palestinian Authority told Abu-Mazen that they could resolve the situation with Hamas militarily. The Interior Ministry, under Nasr Yusuf, issued leaflets saying that anyone firing rockets at the Zionist enemy will be shot. This was an attempt to repeat what happened in 1996 to protect the Israeli borders, arrest those who fire rockets, and confiscate the weapons. Nasr Yusuf was engaged in a confrontation around the Jabalya refugee camp area and deployed armoured vehicles, which the Palestinian people had not seen before. However, he quickly realized that he could not resolve the situation militarily. Now, they are seeking dialogue, and we welcome that."

Q:  "In his recent speech in the Palestinian Legislative Council, Abu Mazen was unyielding."

A: "We responded to the speech. He said that only one authority should exist, and we want one authority. However, regrettably, the only authority that exists is the authority of Israel. Neither Abu-Mazen nor Nasr Yusuf can move from here to there without the permission of the Israeli army. We want a single Palestinian authority, but a strong authority can only exist through elections. Do we have security services and ministries to form an alternative authority? We want a single authority, but we do not want it to be corrupt. "We want an elected authority that represents all the Palestinian people and not an authority that disputes with the people about their livelihood. They are excluding the members of Hamas from jobs in the educational, health, and other fields. In such conditions, we cannot talk about an authority, but about authoritarian rule. If the Palestinian people have rejected Israel's oppression, do you think that they will accept Palestinian oppression? "There is confusion between the resistance and the chaos caused by the struggle in the Fatah movement. The only legitimate weapon is the weapon of resistance which does not kill innocent people and it not used to resolve factional or family disputes. This weapon forced the occupation to withdraw. We will keep our weapons, because no one can guarantee that the occupation will not return. We hear the threats of the occupation throughout the day and at night. Which do you consider is the legitimate weapon? Is it the weapon that disappeared during the confrontation period, and is used in celebrations, or is it the weapon used to maintain steadfastness and defend the people? Is it the weapon that has driven the enemy out or the weapon that is defending the enemy?" Hamas Will Assume Power Only Though Elections

Q:  "Is Hamas interested in seizing power?"

A: "I do not accept the word 'seize' On the issue of education, we want to teach the people our history, and we insist that the people must learn the Quran. Even if the Quran attacks the Jews in some of its verses, the people must read it. We cannot agree to the manipulation of the Quran and the religion. We are against any economic cooperation with Israel . We want a local Palestinian economy so that others do not influence it. We want investment, but without kickbacks, bribes, and commissions. If we can make the interest rate zero in this economy, based on Arab, Islamic, and international investment, then this would be an achievement. We want to spread the culture of resistance. We want tourism, but tourism of a people that have dignity. We will change the names of the settlements to represent the martyrs who died attacking them. We will tell the tourists that the honest rifle was able to achieve victory."

Q: "Does Hamas have a plan to assume power?"

A: "Only through elections."

Q:  "Hamas did not participate in the first legislative elections because it regarded them as the product of the Oslo Agreement. What changes have taken place to prompt Hamas to change its position?"

A: "The Legislative Council used to be called the Palestinian Council. It was not legislative. It consisted of 88 members. We were talking then about a transitional period. Now we are talking about a liberation period and 132 representatives. I guess the current set up is the product of the Oslo Accords and the situation we find ourselves in the product of the British Mandate and the ongoing Israeli occupation. We will participate in the elections based on a program to end the Oslo Accords."

Q:  "Will Hamas participate in the presidential elections?"

A: "What is the problem in that? We represent an alternative to the Authority. We want to serve the people, and the people want servants and not masters. We are part of a larger movement called the international Islamic movement."


Israel Fears that Gaza Would Become Hamas Land; Let Israel Die

Q:  "Israelis fear that Gaza could become the land of Hamas after the withdrawal."

A: "Let Israel die."

Q: "Is this an encouragement for the Palestinian Authority to clamp down on Hamas with an iron fist?"

A: "No one can crackdown on us with either an iron fist or a golden fist."

Q: "Have you prepared to enter the settlements?"

A: "We will enter the settlements and sully the dignity of Israel with our feet. We will stand on the ruins of the Israeli settlements and tell our
people we have prevailed. This is nonnegotiable. We will secure the Gaza Strip and prevent anyone from occupying it again. In past experiences, government land was stolen. "The land of the evacuated settlements should serve as the lungs for the economy to breath. Schools, playgrounds, agriculture, and industry should be established on this land. This is our position, which we expressed in the meeting of the national committee formed to oversee the withdrawal. The government to be formed after the elections will determine the future of this land. "

Q: "In other words, there is an agreement between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas about the future of the settlements' land."

A: "Yes. The Palestinian Authority has the right to manage the land after consulting with the committee which consists of representatives of the national and Islamic factions. "

Q: "Is there a plan for Hamas leaders abroad to return to Gaza?"

A: "We will never give up our right of return. All of Palestine is our land. When any part of it is liberated, any Palestinian and Muslim will have the right to come. This does not mean that this is consistent with the current Isralei withdrawal form Gaza."

Q: "Therefore, will the leaders of Hamas abroad return to Palestine?"

A: "This is up to them. However, the Hamas movement has international dimensions and relations that it must maintain. Therefore, those who maintain these relations must stay abroad. "


"We Do Not Consider the West as an Enemy but we Believe Christian Zionism is Criminal"

Q:  "What is the relationship. between Hamas and Europe?"

A: "All the Europeans that we have met admit that the European position is hypocritical and subservient to U.S. pressure. They look forward to freeing themselves from such pressures. If you want democracy to express the will of the Palestinian people, wait for the results of the elections. If you regard the Palestinian liberation movement, of which Hamas is part, as a terrorist movement, you must look at history. Was De Gaulle a terrorist? Were those who worked to liberate their countries from occupation terrorists? We do not consider the West as an enemy but we believe Christian Zionism is criminal." Source: Memri.

Endnote:
(1) http://aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=3&id=1294

 

Review of Arab editorials

AUGUST 2005
A roundup of commentary from Arab newspapers.

Between a rock and a hard place

The London-based Al Hayat said on August 11 that it was only a matter of time before Iran would use its civilian nuclear program to make weapons. The Saudi-financed daily commented that Iran's quest for nuclear weapons was "completely in line with the nature of the ruling regime in Tehran." It described the Iranian regime as "ideologically and geographically expansionist," adding it was now being "refreshed with a hard-line president to complete the conservative team that runs the affairs" of the country. It went on to say while Israel's nuclear bombs must be mentioned, "one must also affirm that Iran's possession of such bombs will not correct the current imbalance between the Arabs and Israel." In fact, the paper added, it would increase the imbalance because the Arab countries "will find themselves between a rock and a hard place, regardless of Tehran's anti-Israeli slogans that have always been for local consumption and a pretext for foreign intervention in the area".

Washington's difficult situation

The London-based Al Quds Al Arabi on August 11 said that Iran's decision to reactivate its nuclear reactors had confused US and European governments, insisting Tehran had put Washington in a "very difficult situation" because the US cannot escalate its rhetoric against Iran or threaten the use of military force against it. At the same time, Washington cannot remain silent. The independent Palestinian-owned paper said the strongest card in the Iranian leadership's hand was Iraq, adding the US administration had "surrendered" itself to Tehran by failing to bring stability to Iraq through its occupation and because of the current Iraqi leadership's loyalty to Iran. Insisting US options were limited, the paper warned a military strike against Iran would escalate retaliation against US forces in Iraq and maybe Afghanistan, uniting Sunnis and Shias against America. But US silence might turn Iran into a nuclear power in the oil-rich Gulf region, it said. The third option, the paper said, was a US green light to Israel to launch an airstrike against Iran's nuclear reactors, but predicted the Iranian reaction would be forceful, "especially that Tehran possesses long-range missiles that can easily reach Tel Aviv."

Crime against humanity

Egypt's semi-official Al Gumhuriya accused US forces in Iraq of imposing a media blackout on the "barbaric massacres" in Haditha. The mass-circulation daily said in its August 11 editorial that the operations - against "defenseless civilians" - could have been carried out amid silence if it were not for a statement by Iraq's Sunni religious authority revealing the "litter of Iraqi bodies on the streets under complete siege". The editorial, titled "crime against humanity," insisted that those who raised their voices in support of human rights "are now the enemies of humanity in Iraq, mercilessly spilling blood with their military machine, torturing innocent Iraqis in distance prisons". It added that it was time for international organizations to pay more attention in Iraq, saying the country has become a "very brutal example of repressing and destroying humans".

Compensation for Gazans?

Jordan's Al Arab Al Yawm on August 11 wondered how the people of Gaza would behave after Israel's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. It said the people there had become accustomed to a "culture of resistance" against the occupation. The daily, which describes itself as independent, said the Israelis will leave the area with "their gains and compensation, but the problem in Gaza will remain". It argued that the Palestinians and Arabs should insist the Israeli pullout from Gaza be part of the road map peace plan and a step toward withdrawal from the remaining occupied territories. The paper said while Israelis leave with additional assistance and compensation, no one has discussed compensating the Palestinians for the "damage and destruction" of Gaza's infrastructure. It called for international action to reduce the repercussions of the strip's "human and environmental disaster".

Treason can never be justified

Kuwait's Al Rai Al Aam on August 11 criticized calls by some Lebanese Christian leaders for amnesty to members of the disbanded South Lebanon Army (SLA). The force was Israel's proxy militia in southern Lebanon during the 22-year Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon. The pro-government daily said many inside and outside Lebanon were shocked by demands to pardon those "who have blood on their hands" and who had sought refuge in Israel after the liberation of the south. It criticized as "dangerous" dealing with "issues of treason on the pretext of national reconciliation," saying it was impossible to forget the massacres and torture carried out by Israel's collaborators against their compatriots. The paper said European countries had refused to grant asylum to the SLA agents "because of the brutal crimes they committed" and even Israel was treating 3,500 of those in the Jewish state as "nothing more than mercenaries". The Kuwaiti paper insisted demands for an amnesty should not be sectarian-based because "treason is a crime beyond any sect, and cannot be justified for any reason".

Iran nuclear crisis at "crucial point"

Qatar's Al Raya commented in its August 10 editorial on the growing crisis between Iran and Europe following Tehran's decision to resume uranium enrichment. It said the crisis had now reached a "crucial point." The pro-government daily said the meeting of the IAEA that began in Vienna on August 9 to discuss Iran's nuclear program put the issue at a decisive crossroad. It said the IAEA was expected to either issue a warning to Iran to reverse its decision and continue negotiations, or face the UN Security Council and possibly international sanctions. "The latter option is the more serious one because it will pull the region into a new state of tension," the paper warned. It insisted a peaceful solution to the crisis was still possible though there was a Western trend, led by the US, to take a firm position against Iran. The daily said finding a peaceful solution needed more "reasonable and wise political voices to face the threats and defiance...otherwise, there will be a confrontation with undesirable repercussions."

Western hypocrisy

Syria's state-owned Tishreen daily on August 10 said the escalating pressure on Iran coincided with the 60th anniversary of the US attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It commented the "size of the hypocrisy of the powerful countries" was revealed as the US continued to develop its nuclear arsenal during the past six decades, and by the recent revelation that Britain had provided Israel with nuclear weapon capabilities. "The hypocrisy was revealed in how the powerful nations deal with the peaceful nuclear ambitions of the developing world," the paper insisted, "which would allow the building of peaceful programs to serve development - a right that is guaranteed by the nonproliferation treaty."

Resisting Israel is a duty

Lebanon's independent As Safir on August 10 said the issue of the Shia Hizbullah group's weapons was not the weapons themselves, but the position regarding Israel. It added having armaments against Israel was a means, not an end. The question of Hizbullah's weapons, it insisted, was whether Israel is regarded as a neighboring country or an enemy. "If we regard Israel as an enemy, then the logical result is the need to resist it with all weapons and means available during the armed conflict before reaching a just, durable and comprehensive peace," the daily commented. It added that when this peace is achieved, the issue becomes more complicated, "and we should then face and answer whether we regard Israel as just a neighboring country or a state with ambitions in controlling our economy or political decisions." The mass-circulation paper said Israel's policies since its inception toward the Palestinians and Arabs confirms Lebanon's choice of seeing the Arab-Israeli conflict as one that never ends, even if the conflict is not armed. "Therefore," it said, "we consider resisting Israel as a duty, even if the resistance is not armed."

Palestinian police force needs national support

The mainstream Palestinian Al Hayat Al Jadeeda on August 10 called for national support of the Palestinian police force. It said international and Arab assistance was greater than the local support. The pro-government daily said the security institution required the highest form of backing to enable it to achieve its mission to serve the people. It said the force needed the cooperation of the people to respect the law and the security personnel, adding that the police force needed new equipment and technology to enable it to move quickly against violations of law.

Blair's "repressive measures"

The London-based Al Quds Al Arabi on August 10 blasted British Prime Minister Tony Blair for announcing restrictive measures to confront terrorism. It said the measures would have the opposite effects because of their "provocative and racist nature." The independent Palestinian-owned daily accused Blair of behaving like a "third world leader who changes laws like he changes his socks, consolidating dictatorship, centralizing power in his hands and tightening the noose around the neck of his citizens." It opined that while the prime minister said he would issue regulations that would ban incitement against terrorism, he was himself practicing "the worst kind of incitement against the Muslim community when he indirectly accused them of terrorism." The paper added that Muslims in Britain were now living in fear from the official and media incitement, saying they had become a target of hate crimes by extremists. It insisted the Arab regimes would naturally welcome and praise Blair's "repressive measures" that they themselves use against their people.

Iraqis are all in the same boat

Jordan's Al Rai commented that differences among Iraq's political forces on the new constitution were a cause of concern for Iraq, the Arabs and the world in general. The mass-circulation daily said in its August 9 editorial that Iraqis could prove "their wisdom and courage by aborting all plans aimed at pushing them towards a civil war or divisions, and if they went massively to the polls to choose their representatives." It argued it was time Iraqis realized they were all in the same boat and that "the language of threats from this or that party will not contribute except to more differences, sedition and to Iraq's division, which is not in anyone's interests." The daily insisted it was in no one's interests to delay the political process by trying to give more power to one party over another, adding that agreeing on a draft constitution was a common responsibility that must be based on understanding and consensus.

Changing regimes do not require US invasions

The London-based Al Quds Al Arabi on August 8 commented on last week's bloodless military coup in Mauritania that toppled the regime of Moawiya Wald Tayaa. It said the coup proved changing regimes did not require US invasions, but internal forces that had the interests of their country at heart. The independent Palestinian-owned daily argued that while some Arab intellectuals have their reservations about military coups, these were better than those taking place with "American tanks and fighters...as has happened in Iraq." It said the perpetrators of the coup in Mauritania indicated awareness in their understanding of the international and regional equations when they promised democracy and limited their authority for a specific period. "We hope the Mauritanian coup infects other Arab countries and regimes," the paper commented, "especially those which deny the existence of something called the people."

Mission of humans is construction, not destruction

Another London-based daily, Ash Sharq Al Awsat, said on August 8 that one of the greatest challenges facing new Saudi King Abdullah was Islamic cultural education. It said this was important "after the extremist forces have in the past years exploited the sentiments of people to spread the culture of hate and incitement, which succeeded in turning Saudi youth into their own enemies." The Saudi-owned daily argued that since Saudi society was surprised when some of its youth turned into "terrorists killing innocent people", putting the kingdom in an awkward position, it was now necessary to review the basis of extremist educational and cultural thinking. It insisted that it was time to seriously educate the culture of forgiveness and "love of life, belief that the mission of humans is construction, not destruction...and this is the task of the schools, mosques and the media."

Arabs should ensure peace is achieved in Sudan

Lebanon's English-language Daily Star on August 8 commented that the international community needed to renew its efforts to ensure peace in Sudan. Additional efforts were needed especially after the death of Vice President John Garang, it said. The independent daily complained that the Arab world had done little in this regard and suggested that Saudi King Abdullah could contribute by becoming "actively engaged in promoting peace among Sudan's formerly warring parties." It proposed that Saudi private sector leaders could also play a role in "providing the badly-needed investment in the south of the country, and thus offer Sudanese development and prosperity as an alternative to war." The paper warned there are "too many tragedies around us in the Middle East and North Africa to allow the volatile situation in Sudan to degenerate into another regional disaster," adding that Arab action could "go a long way in ensuring that a lasting peace is achieved in Sudan."

On nuclear arsenals and double standards

Jordan's independent Al Ghad on August 8 blamed Western "double standards" for the "collapse of the entire world order." It said the international community must take responsibility and admit the "tragedies and crimes hidden by history." In a commentary by former Jordanian ambassador to the United Nations, Hassan Abu Naama, the daily said the world should not be surprised by the "violence, evil, rage and hatred because people don't forget and history cannot hide the truth forever." It referred to a recent BBC TV report revealing that Britain had secretly provided Israel with the ability to develop its nuclear arsenal after France and the US had refused to supply the Jewish state with the necessary material. The paper accused Britain of also having "planted the seeds" of hatred and violence when it promised a homeland for the Jews in Palestine with the Balfour Declaration of 1917. "Now we see Britain, after the US, was the most eager to punish Iraq for owning delusional weapons of mass destruction and is now leading a campaign against Iran's peaceful nuclear program," the paper argued. "Yet we don't hear a word on Israel's nuclear arsenal."

Consolidating security in times of chaos

Syria's state-owned Al Thawra daily said on August 8 that President Bashar Al Assad's visit to Iran came within the framework of continuing consultations. The paper said relations between the two were strong due to Syria's respect for the keenness of Iran, since its 1979 Islamic revolution, not to threaten its neighbors or the world. The paper said that Iran's newly elected President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad was chosen as the "more capable in continuing to lead Iran and its relations with other countries, starting with Syria, especially during these difficult times facing the region in terms of the "horrifying scheme that is targeting" both countries. It added that Assad's visit to Tehran was to deepen their cooperation to consolidate "security and peace in a region in times of chaos." Source:  Middleast News.
 

Photos from L to R:  #1. The bodies of Palestinians killed during the Israel army raids in Gaza lie in a morgue in the town of Rafah, May 20, 2004. Defying international fury and a rare U.S. rebuke, Israel expanded its bloodiest Gaza Strip  raid in years on Thursday after killing 39 Palestinians in three days of fighting in the Rafah refugee camp. (Goran Tomasevic/Reuters) . #2. Three Israeli bulldozers move towards the Palestinian refugee camp of Rafah, during an ongoing military operation, May 20, 2004. Israel defied international fury at the killing of nearly 40 Palestinians in the Rafah camp, a militant stronghold, to expand its bloodiest Gaza Strip  raid in years on Thursday. (Gil Cohen Magen/Reuters).

Photos from L to R: #1. A Palestinian passes homes destroyed during an Israeli army raid at the Rafah refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip , May 20, 2004. Defying international fury and a rare U.S. rebuke, Israel expanded its bloodiest Gaza Strip raid in years on Thursday after killing 39 Palestinians in three days of fighting in the Rafah refugee camp. (Suhaib Salem/Reuters) . #2. Palestinians gather around the bodies of six of eight Palestinians killed in an Israeli missile strike at a mosque prior to prayer during their funeral in the Rafah refugee camp, southern Gaza Strip, Thursday, May 20, 2004. Dozens of Palestinians have been killed or wounded in the last 2 days. (AP Photo/Kevin Frayer)

Photos from L to R: #1. Palestinian sisters of Ragab Barhum mourn during his funeral in the southern Gaza Strip town of Rafah on the third day of a massive Israeli military operation in the area near Gaza's border with Egypt.(AFP/Mahmud Hams). #2.  Israeli soldiers set down into a grave, the coffin of Israeli army soldier Sergeant Alexei Hayat, during his funeral at the Mt. Herzl military cemetery in Jerusalem, Thursday, May 20, 2004. Hayat was one of 11 Israeli soldiers killed in two separate bomb attacks by Palestinian militants on armored vehicles in Gaza last week. (AP Photo/Oded Balilty).

 

 

 

 

 

Photos from L to R: #1. sraeli left wing Peace Now activists holds signs during a a demonstration against Israel's ongoing operation in the Rafah refugee camp in the Gaza Strip he Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv, Israel, Thursday May 20, 2004. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit). #2. Israeli police officers detain a left-wing activist during a demonstration against Israel's ongoing operation in the Rafah refugee camp in the Gaza Strip, across from the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv, Israel, Thursday May 20, 2004. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)

Photos from L to R: #1. Israeli left wing Peace Now activists holds signs during a a demonstration against Israel's ongoing operation in the Rafah refugee camp in the Gaza Strip, across from the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv, Israel, Thursday May 20, 2004. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit). #2.  Israeli police officers detain a left-wing activist during a demonstration against Israel's ongoing operation in the Rafah refugee camp in the Gaza Strip, across from the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv, Israel, Thursday May 20, 2004. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit). MORE PHOTOS NEXT

Palestinians: "Gaza withdrawal is victory for Islam". Major and Dangerous Campaigns Of hate Against the Jews!!
By Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook

Dr. Ahmad Abu Halabiya, Sharia [Islamic Law] Rulings Council and Rector of Advanced Studies, Islamic University: "We the Palestinian nation, our fate from Allah is to be the vanguard of the war against the Jews until resurrection as the prophet Muhammad said: 'Resurrection will not arrive until you will fight the Jews and kill them.'

Photo: The Palestinian Authority is inciting the current wave of violence through its official media. Jews and Americans are the prime targets. Billboard on the Palestinian Television Network.

Dr. Hassan Khater: "Muhammad said in his Hadith: 'The Hour [of Resurrection] will not arrive until you fight the Jews and the rock and the tree will say: O Muslim, servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!'

"The Prophet said: the Resurrection will not take place until the Muslims  fight the Jews, and the Muslims kill them. The Muslims will kill the Jews,  rejoice [in it], rejoice in Allah's victory. The Muslims will kill the Jews,  and he will hide... "The Prophet said: the Jews will hide behind the rock and tree, and the rock  and tree will say: oh servant of Allah, oh Muslim this is a Jew behind me,  come and kill him!" [PA TV, September 10, 2004 - view this clip here].


Israel's leaving the Gaza Strip is being presented by the Palestinian Authority and the Hamas as a victory for Islam. Palestinian Authority religious leaders and Hamas have for years been  presenting their conflict with Israel as part of an unbroken religious war,  which Allah is waging against Jews - a conflict whose climax will be the extermination of the world's Jews. (Palestinian Media Watch has reported on this ideology. See documentation below.) Within this context, Israel's leaving its towns in Gaza now, is being presented as a victory of Islam in this war. Palestinian Authority Television hosts and participants alike are calling the Israeli moves from its towns as a 'great victory for Allah'. The Hamas website publicized numerous posters that declare the same religious victory theme. The Hamas poster below, showing a face of Hamas  founder Ahmad Yassin laughing, superimposed over a somber religious Jew,  presents the Sharon evacuation plan as a victory of the Koran over the Talmud. The words on the poster: "Our Koran proves that we were right and your Talmud proves that you were wrong..." Another Hamas poster shows a rifle and the Koran with the words: "With those two together the victory has been achieved." One example from the Palestinian Authority's official daily: "...The manager of the office of the Ministry of the Waqf in northern Gaza,  Farid Al-Nayard, said, '...last Friday's sermon was under the title 'On that  day the Believers will be glad with the victory of Allah.''" [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, August 13, 2005]. In June 2004 Palestinian Authority religious leader Ibrahim Mudayris already  preached the religious significance he saw in Sharon's plan, connecting it  to an event described in the Koran, specifically focusing on Israel's plan  to destroy the towns before leaving. The Koranic event and the present expulsion, according to this senior PA  imam, have numerous parallels: 1. Attacks by Muslims against Jews 2. Jews become fearful 3. Jews destroy their own homes 4. Jews flee their towns. Mudayris' sermon of June 4, 2004. "If you [today] trust in Allah, like Muhammad's companions, by Allah, it  will not be impossible for Allah to expel the Jews. "[Allah] fought against them [as is written in the Koran] through their weak  hearts because they are cowards. When they saw someone killed, terror  entered their hearts and they started destroying their own homes. "And now the media reports that they will leave the settlements. Indeed,  they will leave Gaza. They will leave submissive, by Allah's will. They will  leave defeated, like it or not, in the face of this great victory." [Ibrahim Mudayris, PA TV, June 4, 2004]. The following is the text Mudayris was referring to in the Koran: "He [Allah] is the one who has caused those of the People of the Book [i.e.  Jews] who disbelieved to leave their homes unto the first expulsion. You did  not think that they would leave, whereas they [the Jews] were certain that  their fortresses would defend them against Allah. But Allah reached them  from a place where they did not expect, and cast terror in their hearts so  that they destroyed their homes with their own hands and the hands of the  believers...!" [Surat Al-Hashar]. Previously reported examples of numerous Palestinian Authority religious and  academic leaders presenting the war against Israel as a religious war that  will end with the extermination of the Jews. 1. Muhammad Abd Al Hadi La'afi, responsible for Religious Teaching and  Instruction in the Office of the Wakf: "The battle with the Jews will surely come... "The Prophet spoke about in more than one Hadith and the Resurrection will  not come without the victory of the believers [the Muslims] over the  descendants of the monkeys and pigs and with their annihilation." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, May 18, 2001]. 2. Ibrahim Mudayris, Head of the Association for Memorizing the Koran. "The Prophet said: the Resurrection will not take place until the Muslims  fight the Jews, and the Muslims kill them. The Muslims will kill the Jews,  rejoice [in it], rejoice in Allah's victory. The Muslims will kill the Jews,  and he will hide... "The Prophet said: the Jews will hide behind the rock and tree, and the rock  and tree will say: oh servant of Allah, oh Muslim this is a Jew behind me,  come and kill him!" [PA TV, September 10, 2004 - view this clip here]. "The Jews will not live under our rule agreeably permanently, since they  have been treacherous in nature throughout history. A day will come when all  shall rest from the Jews.. "Listen to your Beloved [Muhammad], who tells you about the most dire end awaiting the Jews. The tree and the stone want the Muslim to bring every Jew  to his end. You all know the Hadith." [PA TV, May 13, 2005 - view this clip here]. 3. Muhammad Ibrahim Madi. "All the weapons must be aimed at the Jews, Allah's enemies, the cursed  nation in the Koran, whom Allah describes as monkeys and pigs, worshippers  of the calf and idol worshippers. "Nothing will deter them except the color of blood in their filthy nation .  unless we blow ourselves up, willingly and as our duty, in their midst. "We will fight against them and rule over them until the Jew will hide  behind the tree and rock and the tree and rock will say: 'Muslim! Servant of  Allah, there is a Jew behind me, kill him." [PA TV, August 3, 2001]. 4. Dr. Ahmad Abu Halabiya, Sharia [Islamic Law] Rulings Council and Rector  of Advanced Studies, Islamic University "We the Palestinian nation, our fate from Allah is to be the vanguard of the  war against the Jews until resurrection as the prophet Muhammad said:  'Resurrection will not arrive until you will fight the Jews and kill them.'  We the Palestinians are the vanguard in this issue and in this campaign  whether or not we want this." [PA TV, July 28, 2000]. 5 . Dr. Hassan Khater. "Muhammad said in his Hadith: 'The Hour [of Resurrection] will not arrive  until you fight the Jews and the rock and the tree will say: O Muslim,  servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!' "...Allah meant our land and our people and meant our trees and our stones." [PA TV, December 27, 2004].

Preaching Anti-Jewish Hatred: Transcript from Friday, October 13, 2000, sermon at the Zayed bin Sultan Aal Nahyan mosque in Gaza.
The speaker is Dr. Ahmad Abu Halabiya, Member of the PA appointed "Fatwa Council" and former acting Rector of the Islamic University in Gaza.

Photos: Broadcast of the message of hate on Palestinian Television.

 

Ahmad Abu Halabiya: "Have no mercy on the Jews, no matter where they are.."

"Don’t ever relinquish your rights. Whatever agreements may be signed, even if agreements are signed on Gaza and the West Bank, we shall not forget Haifa, Acre, the Galilee and Jaffa, the Triangle and the Negev and the rest of our cities and villages! It is only a matter of time! The weak will not remain forever weak. And the strong will not remain forever strong. With the help of blessed Allah, that’s the way the Jews are! Have no mercy on the Jews, no matter where they are, fight them, wherever you are. Wherever you meet them, kill them. Wherever you are, kill the Jews, the Americans, who are like them, and those who stand by them. They are all in one trench against the Arabs and the Moslems. ... It is forbidden to befriend Israelis or to aid them. Don’t love them or enter into agreement with them, don’t help them or sign accords with them. Anyone who does this is one of them. This is the word of Allah, blessed be He. They, they are the terrorists. They should be slaughtered. They should be murdered. Such is the word of Allah."

 

Hamas Radio:  Jaffa is the same as Gaza, Tel Aviv the same as Rafah.

 The following is a translation of a hate mongering and terrorism inciting anti-Israeli song broadcast on Sawt Al-Aqsa, , the Hamas radio station on August 16, 2005: "Al-Qassam warriors, Al-Qassam warriors, Rain rockets on the settlers! Prepare the [missile] launchers and aim them at the settlements, Glorify the name of Allah, the lord of the world! Hero, improve the Qassam rockets, Don't let any Jew sleep! Oh, Qassam, we want you to make land mines, Prepare ambushes for the settlers! The fearless fighters descended upon the settlements May Allah preserve them, the symbol of our honor. They carried the bombs, girded themselves with explosive belts And sang songs of leave-taking [as they made their way] to the highest  heavens. Oh, Hamas, your army swears that Millions of shaheeds are marching to Al-Aqsa! We, oh Qassam, swear allegiance to death! Strap on the belts and load them with TNT! Oh, shaheed's mother, be happy for the shaheed! Your son is in paradise, happy and blissful! (Announcer: Listen, Sharon , to the Hamas announcement: Leave Haifa, Jerusalem and Imwas [ancient Emmaeus, an abandoned Palestine  village in the Ayalon Vally on the road to Jerusalem ] We will be victorious, oh, Bush, We will be victorious, oh, Sharon 2, And you will see that tomorrow If Allah so wills it. The Al-Aqsa Brigades will make you tremble in Haifa and Tel Aviv They will strike you in Safed and Acre , Because we, our dear ones, Do not distinguish between [ Jewish] Palestine and [Arab] Palestine3, For [as] Jaffa is the same as Gaza , Tel-al-Zuhour 4is the same as Rafah, And the Galilee is the same as Hebron . We make no distinction between the parts of the earth of the homeland. [i.e.  the whole of Palestine is ours].

2 A quote from 'Abd al-'Aziz al-Rantisi, who headed Hamas until he died in a
targeted killing on April 17, 2004.
3 Another 'Abd al-'Aziz al-Rantisi quote.
4 One of the Arabic names for Tel Aviv usually used by radical Islamic
Palestinian terrorists groups, mainly Hamas.

'Israel will eventually disappear'

Senior Hamas leader tells Italian newspaper pullout plan a temporary solution; says Palestine will become a Muslim state. Hamas will not compromise on one inch of Greater Palestine, Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Zahar told an Italian newspaper earlier this week. Speaking to the Corriere Della Sera newspaper, al-Zahar said Hamas would "definitely not" be prepared for coexistence with Israel should the IDF retreat to its 1967 borders. "It can be a temporary solution, for a maximum of 5 to 10 years. But in the end Palestine must return to become Muslim, and in the long term Israel will disappear from the face of the earth."

Go to hell: Asked about Hamas's intentions to carry out terror attacks in coordination with the disengagement plan, al-Zahar said Hamas has already promised not to initiate violence, and that the group's actions would be in response to Israeli actions. "We won't disrupt the Israeli withdrawal, let them get out of here and go to hell," he said. "The problem will be afterwards, because in the hearts of every Palestinian, the liberation of Gaza must be accompanied by the liberation of Jerusalem and the West Bank."

Palestinian police unloading ballot boxesHamas has again demonstrated that it is mounting a major challenge.

Photo: Hamas is challenging Fatah's traditional political monopoly.

Initial results suggest that the traditional Palestinian party of power - Yasser Arafat's Fatah faction - has emerged on top in an important round of local elections in the West Bank and Gaza.

But the militant movement, Hamas has again demonstrated that it is mounting a major challenge. Both say they did better than the early results suggest, and there are serious disputes over the outcome in two key Gaza constituencies. But election officials say the initial indications are that Fatah won around 55% of the vote, to Hamas' 35%. According to the officials, Fatah won just over 52 of the municipalities being fought for. Hamas took around 30. And these results matter. They shed light on a process of significant change that is sweeping through the Palestinian political system. Electoral test: The Fatah faction that Mr Arafat founded and led dominated the political scene for decades. Under his leadership elections were rare. But now a phase of democratisation has begun, and Fatah is being put to the electoral test. These municipal polls are to be followed by a general election in a few months time. And Fatah is locked in a major contest with Hamas.

 Israel will eventually disappear

London attack: Al-Zahar said the London bombings, which occurred during the interview, are to be expected in countries that support the United States. "It's no wonder today they have found terror attacks in their home," he said. "I am opposed to attacks against civilians, whoever they are, but why not tell it like it is - if the British soldiers were not in Baghdad and Bazra - there would be mercy for London today." However, al-Zahar stopped short of supporting the attack on the London Underground, but tried to "explain" the acts of suicide bombers. "There is a broad popular people's movement against American arrogant hegemony. World leaders, headed by the Bush and Blair governments, should have been more attentive to the voice of poorer countries."

Foreign Ministry protests: In Israel, Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom provided a translation of part of the interview and parts of the Hamas constitution Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom for European Union envoy Javier Solana, in an attempt to explain Israel's rejection for negotiations with Hamas. The Ministry has also embarked on a campaign to discourage Europeans from dealing with Hamas, including an English translation of Hamas's convention, to be distributed to diplomats in a bid to illustrate the movement's radical and dangerous character to the attention of decision makers throughout the world. "Now, when Europe has offered to recognize Hamas on a political level, al-Zahar provides clear statements of what to expect from the organization," Ministry officials told Ynet. "He does not even attempt to speak ambiguously in an attempt to please Europe and finds it difficult to hide the group's happiness at the London bombings."

Al-Qaeda urges attacks on Canadians

A new al-Qaeda manual posted on the Internet is calling for terrorist attacks against Canadians, and specifies that businessmen, politicians, scientists, soldiers and tourists should be targeted, according to U.S. researchers. Canada is one of six nations whose citizens are identified as "human targets" in the Arabic-language publication, which is reported to be the work of senior Egyptian al-Qaeda figure Saif al-Adel. The manual, called The Al-Battar Military Camp, ranks Canadians as the fifth most important "Christian" terrorist targets, behind Americans, Britons, Spaniards and Australians. Italians were ranked sixth. The manual was obtained and translated by the SITE Institute, a terrorism research centre in Washington, D.C. It is the latest edition of a publication that is said to be aimed at new al-Qaeda adherents scattered around the world. "This al-Qaeda magazine is published and circulated through the terrorist group's Web site, along with other propaganda," said Rita Katz, executive director of the institute. "It contains specific military guidance and instructions on how to effectively target al- Qaeda's enemies. There are physical training programs, diagrams of weapons and chapters dedicated to combat strategy. Canadians should take very seriously the fact that their country is identified as a top potential target by al-Qaeda."

THE ARAB POINT OF VIEW. FROM AL JAZEERA

Settler-funding a billion dollar question

Now that Israel plans to spend $2 billion to dismantle just 25 of these enclaves in the West Bank and Gaza - for which US aid has been requested - raises the question of how much money has been poured into the ambitious settlement project, and exactly where it came from. The official answer: No one knows. Vice Prime Minister Shimon Peres estimates Israel has spent about $50 billion since 1977, when the hardline Likud government took over from his Labour party. Other former finance ministers and government officials do not discount a price tag - commonly floated but never documented - of $60 billion.

Despite the Gaza pullout, some 
settlements are being expanded

"No one eye in the world saw the whole picture," says Labour Party lawmaker Danny Yatom, a confidant of the late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. "Most of it is not camouflaged, but it is not possible to connect A to B to C to D to E to F to G." Calculating an exact figure is impossible because much of the building was financed through winks and nods, an opaque state budget and secret military spending that sometimes violated Israel's laws and undercut international peacemaking efforts, according to official Israeli inquiries as well as interviews with past and present officials, settlers and their opponents. Among the methods used, the interviews show, were government subsidies, shadowy land deals, loopholes in military spending, and an auditing bait-and-switch in which US aid was used to free up billions of dollars for spending on the settlements formally opposed by the United States.

Settlements have carved up
occupied Palestinian land

Expansion continues: Even today, with preparations under way for demolishing 21 settlements in Gaza and four in the West Bank, housing and roads continue to be built in West Bank settlement blocs Israel wants to keep in a final peace deal with the Palestinians. This contradicts the internationally backed "road map" peace plan to halt settlement expansion. And a government-commissioned inquiry in March revealed similar methods were used to build and expand dozens of unauthorised West Bank "outposts" - set up as flag-showing exercises and usually consisting of a handful of people in mobile homes.  It found widespread government complicity in establishing more than 100 such outposts, and the inquiry's chief, former prosecutor Talia Sasson, called the government's actions "a blatant violation of the law". Last year, the funding of the outposts came in for sharp criticism from the state controller, the government's main watchdog. It found at least two cases where the Housing Ministry funded outposts that the military had ordered demolished. Government policy: Now settler leaders, eager to embarrass Prime Minister Ariel Sharon over his Gaza withdrawal plan, say they had official backing in all their ventures. "Let me be very, very clear: It's not a question of dark-of-night grabs, or hide-and-seek or deceit on anyone's part," said lawmaker Yitzhak Levy of the pro-settler National Religious Party, who headed ministries in Likud and Labour governments. "It is government policy," he said. The settlements started after 1967 under Labour governments, which sought to confine them to border areas they considered necessary for national security.

Some outposts,  illegal under
Israeli law, are state-funded

Benefits for settlers:  But then Likud came to power in 1977, claiming a God-given right to the whole West Bank and Gaza Strip. The chief settlement advocate was Ariel Sharon, the former general who - now as prime minister - has ordered the Gaza pullback. Using his Cabinet posts between 1977 and 1992 - agriculture, defence and housing - he doled out government grants, low-cost loans and tax breaks to settlers. He also gave birth to the idea of advertising the enclaves as bedroom communities just minutes from Israeli urban centres. Some settlements close to towns in Israel proper were subsidised by giving the inhabitants tax cuts, cheap mortgages and grants of between $6900 and $57,000 - perks ordinarily reserved for outlying areas. Maaleh Adumim, the largest settlement with about 30,000  people, received this "priority" status even though it is just 5km from Jerusalem. So did Elkana, an affluent settlement 8km from Israel's economic hub, Tel Aviv. Not legal: Settler leader Adi Mintz said even some of the settlers thought the tax breaks for bedroom communities were unfair.  The state also picked up as much as half the tab for hooking up utilities. And pro-settler lawmakers fought to control key ministries such as Construction and Housing, National Infrastructure, and Transportation so they could direct money to settlements. "When I was at the Ministry of Housing, I set the objective of expanding [settlements in] outlying areas," said lawmaker Levy. The classified defence budget further propelled expansion, funding troop deployments to guard settlements, and building fences and wide roads for settlers living among more than 2 million Palestinians who adamantly oppose their presence. A government official conceded that some uses of military funds "in hindsight ... aren't legal and shouldn't have been done". He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing possible violations of the law by the government. Winks and nods:  At times, government watchdogs balked at the way government funds were being used. Most recently, the Interior Ministry launched an investigation into the transfer of $2.8 million in 2003 and 2004 from settlement municipalities to a settlement lobby group, which is funding the fight against the Gaza pullout.

Washington has indirectly
funded settlement projects

Because the state and separate ministerial budgets do not break down outlays by region, it is difficult to identify the flow of money to settlements. Supporters and detractors both say this allowed Israeli governments to hide behind the budget when it came to settlement financing - and forestall friction with Washington. "The state of Israel didn't want a head-on confrontation with the United States ... therefore Israel always did things with winks and nods," said Mintz, the settler leader. Despite its declared opposition to settlements, Washington only began taking action in the early 1990s, when Israel sought billions of dollars in US loan guarantees. Washington said it would deduct sums that went into settlements dollar for dollar. US lobby: In 2003, when Israel was granted $9 billion in loan guarantees over three years, the cut was $289.5 million. Officials familiar with the issue, and speaking on condition of anonymity, say that low figure was reached with the help of the influential pro-Israel lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, known as AIPAC. AIPAC officials refused to discuss the issue on the record, but denied they helped to negotiate the numbers. Israel also used private US donations for which it secured US tax-exempt status, said David Newman, a political scientist at Israel's Ben Gurion University who researched settlement funding. US tax laws do not exempt donations for political activities such as settlements. Israel separated the World Zionist Organisation from the quasi-governmental Jewish Agency, a move that allowed donors to inject money into settlements without losing tax exemptions.  Land expropriated: In reality, the two groups operate under one umbrella, with the same officials, departments and administrators overseeing the activities, Newman said. Perhaps the greyest area is how Israel expropriated, confiscated or purchased land for settlements. During the first 12 years of occupation, more than 4000 hectares of land confiscated by the military for security needs were handed to settlers, according to Defence Ministry statistics quoted in Lords of the Land, a book by Israeli authors Akiva Eldar and Idit Zartel. Even after Israel's Supreme Court in 1979 raised the bar for security-related land confiscations, the state seized thousands more hectares (acres) of West Bank land on security grounds and turned it over for settlers, some living in unauthorised enclaves. The state-funded Jewish National Fund, along with settler groups and their supporters, also bought land from private Palestinians, using middlemen to cloak the sellers' identity and shield them from attack by other Arabs. Shaul Goldstein, head of the Gush Etzion Regional Council in the West Bank, said his council recently paid $10,000 for 990 square metres of Palestinian land - about one-twentieth of the cost of land just over the border.

Excerpts from the Arab Media: Israel's Gaza trap...Terrorist blame elsewhere...Pressing the press... U.S. Arab Bank funded terrorism. Compiled by By Dr. Joseph Lerner.

AL-AHRAM WEEKLY 18-24 Aug.'05: EDITORIAL: Behind the facade". [IMRA: AAW's editorials enunciate official Egyptian positions.] QUOTES FROM TEXT": "Arabs, more than most, should have learned by now to be able to see beyond the fanfare surrounding Israel's withdrawal and instead address crucial strategic concerns"..."dismantling its settlements in Gaza in the hope of retaining the enormous settlement infrastructure it has already gobbled up". FULL TEXT: Sharon has persuaded international opinion that the road to a solution to the Palestinian cause passes through Gaza. So skillfully has he raised hopes that many had looked forward to the withdrawal, oblivious to the advantages he has to gain, not least the opportunity to tighten defences and refresh his forces. Yet the Arabs, more than most, should have learned by now to be able to see beyond the fanfare surrounding Israel's withdrawal and instead address crucial strategic concerns. We must not evade discussion of the possibility that the Gaza disengagement will become the first nail in the coffin of an independent, sovereign Palestinian state with defined borders and territorial contiguity for this, whatever he may say to the contrary, is part of Sharon's plan. Disengagement from Gaza is the obverse of his dream of burying Palestinian statehood. The disengagement, first unveiled at the Herzliya Conference in May 2003, could all too easily hamper the Palestinian drive to statehood for however important the benefits that accrue to the Palestinians it presents a difficult platform upon which to build a state. Israel is in the process of pushing for a tradeoff. It is dismantling its settlements in Gaza in the hope of retaining the enormous settlement infrastructure that has already gobbled up nearly a third of the West Bank. Sharon openly admitted as much when, in an attempt to appease Jewish extremists who regard the withdrawal from Gaza as a betrayal of the Zionist dream of a Greater Israel, he announced that Jewish settlement of the West Bank would continue. Nor should we forget -- Sharon certainly never tires of reminding his audiences -- that President George W Bush gave him his word that Israel could hold on to the larger settlements in the West Bank. And those settlements are an integral part of the plan to annex East Jerusalem. What remains of the dream of a Palestinian state, then, should Israel succeed in securing its control over the West Bank and the whole of Jerusalem? [IMRA: So why is Egypt cooperating?]. Even the disengagement from Gaza is fraught with contradictions. Israel wants to retain control over airspace, territorial waters, borders and ports of entry. Even on this small patch of land Palestinian control will only be partial. Sharon's version of disengagement is clearly intended as a façade, disguising the lack of substance -- the territorial sovereignty -- that is a condition of statehood.

AL-AHRAM WEEKLY 18-24 Aug.'05:"Closing ranks". HEADING:"Terror will never dent the unity of Egyptians, writes Ali Hefzi, former governor of North Sinai". QUOTES FROM TEXT: "Terror was first introduced into the region by the Zionist groups Stern and Ergun"..."Western countries offering refuge to fundamentalist (Islamist) militants over the past two decades must also shoulder part of the blame"..."individuals used in the attacks are mere tools and their death during the operation is obviously convenient for the invisible masterminds who plan the atrocities." EXCERPTS: The hand of terror rocked the City of Peace on the very anniversary of the 1952 Revolution. The cowardly attack on Sharm El-Sheikh is particularly painful, for the peninsula has a history that borders on the divine, .... It is in Sinai that Egyptians have defended themselves against invaders since Pharaonic times, and up to the war of 1973. [IMRA: Also the Sinai for expansionist.  .  .We have every right to take pride in the progress the peninsula has witnessed since  ...the peace agreement with Israel in 1979. Those who visited Sinai many years ago ...  are amazed by the scale of progress, the roads that have been built, the land that has been reclaimed and tourism. The attacks on Taba (October 2004) and Sharm El-Sheikh (July 2005) came as a shock to all Egyptians,  ... But where did it originate? Terror was first introduced into the region by the Zionist groups Stern and Ergun, which used violence to expel the original inhabitants of Palestine prior to 1948. As for the recent wave of violence, Western countries offering refuge to fundamentalist militants over the past two decades or so must also shoulder part of the blame. The repercussions of terror attacks exceed the magnitude of the initial mayhem. Intelligence experts vouch that most terror attacks involve prolonged planning, surveillance and coordination. Major terror operations often involve financing and guidance from abroad. Those who carry out the attacks are selected with care and in most cases the perpetrators have no police record or known inclination to violence. The individuals used in the attack are mere tools and their death during the operation is obviously convenient for the invisible masterminds who plan the atrocities. No security regime, however sophisticated, is foolproof. There is always a chink in the armour that can be exploited to devastating effect. Let's not forget that countries far more advanced than Egypt have been frequent targets of terror. Investigations into the Sharm El-Sheikh bombings are still underway and should not be prejudged. But it is plain to all that the bombers, whoever they are, were seeking to undermine not only security but our national unity. We cannot let them win. We must continue to fight terror in all its forms, for this is the only way to keep the country safe. We must make every effort to apprehend the perpetrators. But in doing so we must avoid doing anything that our enemies may use to harm this country or divide our ranks. We need, too, more international and regional cooperation to prevent a repetition of such attacks. Any loopholes in our security must be closed. .


JORDAN TIMES 19 Aug.'05: "JPA starts taking measures against 'some' weekly papers"
. HEADING" Association committee is tasked with monitoring performance of country's weeklies and making monthly reports" By Alia Shukri Hamzeh. QUOTES FROM TEXT: "started taking legal measures against editors and publishers of  'a handful' of weekly newspapers for legal and ethical violations"..."The association has authority only over its members. Non-JPA members who practice the profession are considered illegal journalists, according to the Press and Publications and the JPA laws."..."He and other publishers and editors of weeklies expressed fear that the reaction to a number of unprofessional weeklies could harm them or negatively affect freedom of expression."..."unfair to subject all weeklies to the same treatment or to label all as unprofessional because of a number of rotten apples on top of the box".

 EXCERPTS: AMMAN - The Jordan Press Association (JPA) has started taking legal measures against editors and publishers of "a handful" of weekly newspapers for legal and ethical violations, JPA President Tareq Momani said Thursday. Momani told The Jordan Times following a JPA council meeting that there were some weeklies printing "slanderous material, rumours and false information.".  .  ."We are going to take all measures to ensure that citizens' reputation is not harmed and that practising journalists abide by the laws that govern their performance," he added. Momani said the JPA council has tasked its six-member professional committee with monitoring the performance of the country's weeklies and making monthly reports of violations of the JPA Law and journalists' code of ethics.  .  .The journalists' code of ethics requires a journalist to be objective and precise in relaying information and to double-check and verify any material before sending it to print. According to JPA bylaws, a journalist who violates the law and code of ethics faces various measures, starting with a warning, an ultimatum, being referred to disciplinary councils or being banned from practising the profession for a period no longer than three years and could be dismissed from the association. The association has authority only over its members. Non-JPA members who practise the profession are considered illegal journalists, according to the Press and Publications and the JPA laws... JPA has sent a warning to the chief editor of one weekly and referred the name of a writer (non-JPA journalist) at the same weekly to the attorney general. Momani refused to elaborate but said the weekly has been printing "slanderous information about a public figure." The measures are seen as an overdue step against a majority of what many perceive as "sensationalist tabloid publications working in an unprofessional manner" and harm the country's image and its march towards greater democracy and public freedom. A number of practising journalists expressed satisfaction with the move... These journalists who were contacted by The Jordan Times also hailed remarks by His Majesty King Abdullah on the matter in an address to officials, deputies and senators on Tuesday. They also called for genuine application to the law that govern the profession. In his speech, the King said some weekly newspapers compete in spreading rumours and lies to achieve financial gains, even at the expense of national interests.  .  ."Violators of the law should be pointed out and measures should be taken against them immediately and in accordance with the law. But this does not mean that all weeklies should be persecuted in the process," said Al Hadath weekly's publisher Nidal Mansour. He and other publishers and editors of weeklies expressed fear that the reaction to a number of unprofessional weeklies could harm them or negatively affect freedom of expression. Jordan has over 25 registered weeklies. According to Momani, around 7-8 weeklies are deemed as violators of the law and disregard any professional standards or code of ethics. Mansour, however, said the number was far greater and that a mere handful of weeklies were professional. But, Mansour, who also heads the Centre for Defending Freedom of Journalists, added that it would be unfair to subject all weeklies to the same treatment or to label all as unprofessional because of a number of rotten apples on top of the box. "The most dangerous issue here is that the terms bad, unprofessional and even scandalous press are being used against all weeklies. This makes people think that the industry does not deserve or cannot handle freedom of expression, and that in turn is harmful to the country," Mansour said. "In the end it's the public who decides to buy the publication or not." Momani in turn insisted that the profession will be protected and that those who abide by the laws and code of ethics will also be supported and safeguarded.
 

Al-Jazeera and Al-Manar Coverage of Armed Palestinian Factions in Gaza. The following are excerpts about armed Palestinian factions celebrating in the sea, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on August 18, 2005

Today's first clip includes an Al-Jazeera report of an interview with a fighter from Islamic Johad's  Al-Quds Squad. It is followed by a report from Hizbullah's Al-Manar TV, with interviews of armed PLFP terrorists.

Reporter: The siege on the Gaze strip from land, air, and sea has led the Palestinian factions to take up positions that they had not been able to reach throughout the Intifada, in order to mark the impending end of the occupation of part of their homeland. The Al-Quds Squads, the military wing of the Islamic Jihad movement, charged into the raging sea aboard boats, which were almost completely destroyed by the bullets of the Israeli Navy. Their clear message was that the Gaza Strip is still not entirely liberated, and that the West Bank is groaning under the weight of the occupation and its settlers.

Al-Quds Squads fighter: We chose the sea to stress that our sovereignty over the sea is like our sovereignty over the land, Allah willing, and that the sea is our sea and the land is our land. We dedicate these celebrations to our courageous martyrs, to the leaders of the Al-Quds Squads, to the 'Izz Al-Din Al-Qassam Brigades, to the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, to all the national and Islamic factions, and to the prisoners in the Zionist occupation jails.

Armed PLFP Terrorists on Al-Manar TV

Reporter: They come from the orange and olive groves, and emerge from dark corners. Their only option is resistance and confrontation. The aggression has reached every corner of the occupied Palestinian lands and has even reached PFLP Secretary-General Abu Ali Mustafa. The brigades that are named after him carried out a revenge operation on October 7, 2001, killing the most senior Israeli in the Intifada - the Intifada that culminated in Israel's announcement of the disengagement plan, which ends its military and civilian presence in the Gaza Strip settlements.

PFLP Fighter: This withdrawal is only because of the blows of the Palestinian resistance, and the steadfastness of our courageous Palestinian people. The Palestinian people insisted on delivering blow after blow, despite the heavy losses and casualties we sustained due to our steadfastness.

Reporter: The Abu Ali Mustafa Brigades, like the other factions, have deterred the occupation army. Their fighters carried out courageous operations, including martyrdom operations. Their commanders were arrested and assassinated, and PFLP Secretary-General Ahmad Sa'dat was was held prisoner in Jericho. But this series of blows has not destroyed the spirit of resistance among the fighters. Sources: Al Jazeera, Memri, Imra, Al-Manar.
 

ARAB MEDIA WATCH: INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING  By Maximillien de Lafayette  

ARAB JOURNALISTS ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED

Some 1,500 years ago, Prophet Mohammad condemned the "people of the pen", the poets, writers and messengers of the word. In his "HADITH AL SHARIF" (Noble Dialogues and Discourse of the Prophet), Mohammad told his followers "WA INNA AL SHOUARA'AH MIN AHLI AL NAR", meaning verbatim "Poets (or writers, in today's terminology "journalists") are from the parents of fire". He meant by this that, poets and writers are decadent, sinful and untrustworthy. And consequently, they will go to hell. He knew, back then, that the Arab mind and the Arab pen are not to be trusted, for they distort the truth, corrupt the masses  and cause mass confusion. And today, 1,500 years after such a prophetic proclamation, the Muslim Arab mind did not change a bit. Especially in the circle and milieux of educated and cultured Muslims, in the Arab corporate world, science, media and broadcasting. By nature and raison d'etre, the Arab media will never cease to attack Israel, will keep on inciting and encouraging Arabs and Muslims to hate the Jews and the Christians,  and to disseminate false information about Israel and the United States foreign policies. This Muslim intellectualism distortion and those hate and vengeance campaigns against the Jews and Christians in the Arab media negatively and dangerously affect the Arab and Muslim populace  around the globe. Muslims and Arabs who live and work in the United States are not immune. For almost 20 years, Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser kept on lying to his people and to the immense Arab world,  and  continued to fabricate stories about the imminent danger of world Zionism. In  his weekly speeches at the Radio of Cairo (HOUNA AL QAHIRA), and the daily political broadcast of "AKAZEEB WA HAKA'IK" (LIES AND TRUTHS), the Egyptian president consistently and methodologically  disseminated false information about the military power of Egypt, the might of the Arab League, and the danger of Zionism ("Sahayinah" in Arabic). His speeches were printed in their entirety on the front page of all the Arab newspapers, except in Tunisia. No rationale, analytical analysis and unbiased reporting are to be found in official communiqués and statements issued by Arab officials, nor in Arab editorials. And this week, I found an abundance of examples which illustrate the biased, distorted and sick news reporting by the Arab media and childish accusations scenarioed by top Arab officials. Here are some:

 

THE ISRAELI/JEWISH POINT OF VIEW. What they say, write, publish and argue about.

________________________________________________

Give them the Death they Revere

 

 By Arlene Peck

 The Arabs are bombing, murdering, mutilating, raping and wreaking havoc all over the Judeo/Christian world.  Israel has nothing to do with it…nothing!   The front pages have been completely filled with the latest catastrophic actions from these savage, barbaric Arabs who tortured and slaughtered hundreds of school children and their mothers during the past few days in the horrific school bombings.  Children! Babies, who were forced to drink their own urine, because they were tortured and denied water and food for over two days. One five or six year-old child was reported to have been killed by having a bayonet thrust through his little body when he had the audacity to ask for water from these "brave men" who were holding them hostage. Then if that wasn't bad enough, over twenty of these small children were shot in the back from snipers on the  roof-tops as they were trying to break away to run to the safety of their mothers arms.  

The Muslims are experts in killing babies. I remember the massacre of the Kindergarten in Maaolat some years ago.  More so, I remember covering the war in June of '82 in Lebanon and saw what cowards these vermin were. They excel in bombings and terror attacks on subways, planes and schools.  But when they have to fight man-to-man combat, they disappear or run out with their hands in the air, waving white flags before the first shot is fired. They also captured two French journalists as hostages, so as to influence French domestic laws. This is especially interesting since Mr. Jacques Chirac and France have gone out of they’re way to alienate their western allies and welcome these thugs with open arms into their country.

They want to pressure the French to change their laws on headscarfs. Otherwise, they were going to use the journalists to make a political statement. Folks, this is only the beginning. Within five years the required fashion in Paris will be burqas. Page two in the Times continued with a story of how a female “suicide” bomber wearing an explosive device stuffed with metal bolts killed at least nine people in a Moscow subway station in a blast and injured about a hundred more. This, in addition to the two airplanes that the Muslim fundamentalist’s blew up a few days ago, in Russia. Then over a hundred more countrymen were killed.  I can’t even look at the television and see the nightly death toll of our soldiers in Iraq. We are paying a great price with our soldiers blood to bring freedom to this modern day Babylon.   The reality is, if we don't root out terrorism in all it’s forms, wherever it is, this nightmare that we are watching being played out on the nightly news will eventually reach our shores again, as well as the free nations around the world. Somewhere buried in the LA Times was a story about how these same subhuman savage “militants” who had killed twelve Nepalese workers want more!  More concessions and more blood!  Later in the day I received a graphic video of them, beheading these poor civilians. We are dealing with a mentality that only understands force. 

I've seen it!  The Russians aren't known for being very politically correct.  If I were living through the horror they've gone through these past few days, I'd pressure my government into sending a "laser-guided missile" 
  dipped in pig blood into every one of those mosques  where they plan, train and finance these attacks,  with a note attached reading, "Never again!"  In fact, now would be a perfect time to drop leaflets on the mosques that plan and train the terrorists that from now on the next thing dropped on them are missiles dropped in pig oil. No more 'restrained action' as they are regularly ordered by our government, the EU and UN. When the next terrorists action happens, do it!  Somebody has to do something!  President Bush is out there trying to defend his policy in Iraq because of these very same terrorists and we are still going on and on and on over locating the WMD’s, when everyone and their Arab brother’s know that they have been moved into Syria.  Who do we think we're kidding?  This effort must be worldwide. Whether it's Afghanistan, Russia, the Philippines, United States or Israel!  It is the freedom of every individual that is at stake here!  When are we going to wake up!   Our lives are being disrupted on a daily basis.

 

TODAY GAZA, TOMORROW?
By Micah Halpern

The Gaza Redeployment is not just about Israel's withdrawal from the area. It is not just about the relationship between Israelis and Palestinians. It never was. Israel's withdrawal from Gaza has always been a measuring stick, a marker, a barometric tool to determine the winds of change in the region. The fateful day approaches. There are many interested parties and many agenda. Let's examine them. The most important agenda to examine is that of the United States. Plain and simple, the United States needs this redeployment to happen and they are exerting a tremendous amount of energy to make it happen. The United States is pressuring Israel not just to leave but to also offer aid to the Palestinians on their way out. The United States is pressuring the Palestinians to let this happen and to stop any provocateurs, any acts of terror, from dismantling the process. 

The United States envisions peace between Israelis and Palestinians. They see the Gaza Redeployment as a massive step towards the fulfillment of that vision. Today Gaza, tomorrow the West Bank. And they want to make certain that the transition takes place quietly.  The United States needs to prove that they can make good on their promise. They promised to support Palestinian Prime Minister Abbas, they want to secure his position. They believe in him, more than do many of his local Palestinian constituents. They believe that Abbas wants to bring peace to his people. They want the Palestinian people to view Abbas as a strong leader and they think that the Gaza Redeployment will bring proof to the people that with peace comes good, that if peace emerges and liberalization occurs, their lives will be improved, their voices will be heard. The United States also believes, I would say naively, that the best tactic against Palestinian extremists is pelting them with examples of the good that is gained through peace.  The United States believes in good will gestures. Egypt, on the other hand, wants to regain partial control of the area. The Egyptians are lying low during this process of withdrawal and, as a result, nobody is watching them very closely. They have issues and their own very strong agenda for the Gaza Redeployment. Gaza is an area that for many years was under Egyptian control. That control was vanquished by Israel. The Egyptians do not see the Palestinians as strong and do not believe that they will ever gain strength, even under the leadership of Abbas. And that pleases the Egyptians. A weak Palestinian government leaves the door open for more experienced Egyptians to enter in a pseudo-advisory capacity and wield power in the area. With the Palestinians "in charge" and with the Israelis out of the area, the Egyptians become the doorkeepers, literally and figuratively, of Gaza. It is the Egyptians who will control the border. It is the Egyptians who will observe from the outside what happens on the inside of Gaza, and then determine their next moves.  In the Palestinian world, Egypt, not the United States, is big brother. The Palestinians themselves are split into two groups. There are those Palestinians who hope and those Palestinians who hope to sabotage the Gaza Redeployment.  One group of Palestinians believes strongly in Abbas and they are hopeful that he can and will create a better life not just for their children, but also for themselves. They are the silent majority of Palestinians, not just silent, but silenced by the other group of Palestinians, their louder, more enthusiastic brothers and cousins. This group wants the withdrawal to fail and they intend to use the failure as a metaphor for the leadership of Abbas and as a tool with which to topple his government. This group thinks of Abbas not as their leader but as someone who has sold them out, who by virtue of accepting this unilateral withdrawal is collaborating with the enemy. And they want an all-out war with Israel.

The rest of the Arab world is watching, quietly, care