|
HISTORY OF THE DIASPORA ART
By Maximillien de Lafayette
Painting (Untitled), by RAZMIG HAKIGIAN.
To fully understand the Armenian Diaspora contemporary painting in all its styles and genres from surrealism to cubism and from neo-classicism to abstract, one must learn about the adjacent and parallel national/ethnic Armenian arts that gave birth to the art of painting. Armenian painting is the noble product and cause-effect of Armenian national arts that grew years before Armenian modern painting came to life. Without learning about the art of manuscripts, the early miniatures and portraiture of precedent Armenian painters, the architecture of Armenian churches and cathedrals, the symbol of light in the life and socio-philosophical concept of Armenian Christianity (Orthodoxy, Syriac, Assyrian, Aramaic and Catholicism alike), without understanding the symbols of the Katchkars, without comprehending the Genocide effect on the Armenian people, without studying the Diaspora, without sailing through the exile era of Armenian people, poets, artists, scientists, philosophers and commoners, without appreciating the ethnic art of Armenian rugs and carpets weaving, without parading before the Armenian handwork and lace making art, one would not fully understand contemporary Armenian art. Yes, of course, we will still enjoy the beauty of forms, shapes, colors, compositions, harmony, equilibrium, rebellious and free movements of the brushes, nostalgic strokes of romantic and almost all the time defying Armenian artists that create all the beauty, intensity and supremacy of Armenian contemporary art.
But,
appreciating Armenian art without understanding it is just like if we were
looking at a magnificent edifice from the antiquities without being able to
read the inscriptions on the tablets, on the columns, on the obelisks that
explain all what we are looking at. Would you be satisfied to look at a
painting, enjoying its beauty and the talent of its master without knowing
how, why and when it came to life? Would you feel satisfied if you learn
half of the story…appreciating a painting without knowing what the painter
meant or expressed on his canvas? It is the same thing when it comes to the
Armenian art of the 19th and 20th centuries. Take my
word for granted. I will try to shed some lights on the mysteries and
secrets of the Armenian modern/contemporary painting. After all, half of the
beauty of a painting is in its secret.
Madonna, 2000 by Hrant Mirzoian.
WHAT IS DIASPORA ART?
Is there an identifiable
pure Armenian art? Is the painting of Armenian artists in the 19th
and 20th centuries a pure Armenian art with an ethnic identity or
an international art expression ? Do Armenian artists paint like their
counterparts around the world and share similar techniques, explore
identical themes, use familiar media, convey parallel messages or do they
confine themselves to their national ideology, regional concerns, internal
affairs and their own way of life, using Armenian style or Armenian genre of
choosing certain colors, projecting characteristic lines and envisioning
Armenian compositions adopted from
THE
DIASPORA ART
Red Max, 1930 by Leon Tutundjian.
Because a considerable
number of art critics strongly believe that Armenian art came out of
necessity, that Armenian art was the inevitable product, cause-effect of an
Armenian tragedy known to the world as the Armenian Genocide?! Such questions
are asked to allow us to explore and comprehend the identity, limitations,
infinity, dimensions and characteristics of the art of Armenian painters
inside and outside Armenia. It is my strong belief that Armenian artists from
the beginning of the 19th century rivaled their colleagues and
other artists of the world at all level. In many instances, the Armenian
artists did paint like Armenian individuals, like Armenian priests, like
Armenian sheltered and sorrowful souls, like Armenian rivers humming nostalgic
and bleeding songs, like Armenian prairies and proud Armenian mounts defying
eternity and divine majesty in their beauty, serenity and historical
formidable struggles and accomplishments. No doubt when you look at a Martiros
Saryan’s (The loving patriarch of the Armenian artists, more on him later)
painting, you see Armenia in his colors, in his themes, in his painful and
defying strokes. Armenia is all over his canvases whether he is painting Mount
Ararat, Lac Sevan, sad and obscure Armenian villages, Armenian faces in
markets, souks, bazaars, on mastabahs and narrow streets of Istanbul and
Ankara, or whether he is not addressing any Armenian theme on the linens. The
man breathes, and lives his beloved Armenia twenty four hour a day. And so did
the 99% of the Armenian artists during and after the Turkish domination, the
massacres, the genocide, the famine, the Armenian struggles and the exile of
millions of them to Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Greece, Cyprus, Malta and so many
other countries. Then, is there an authentic, purely Armenian art. The answer
is affirmative.
Yes,
there is an Armenian art but, with an universal appeal and an artistic
aesthetical mastery of a world class quality. But, how about the Armenian
artists who where born to wealthy Armenian families in Europe and in the
United States, In Venezuela, Santos in Brazil or Nice, Cannes and St. Tropez
in France? Do they feel the same way ? Do they express their sensations and
feelings on canvases the same way a hungry Armenian artist in the empty
streets of Konia, Adana, Izmir, Yerevan during the killings of Armenians?
Honest critics escape those questions. They don’t like to address the issue,
simply because the answers are not so easy. The majority of Armenian art
history teachers in American universities adopted one singular set of very
complicated and perplex answers and explanations to those questions and
answers. Prominent
American art historians authorities on the subject believe that those
questions can be answered by historical and comparative analysis.

Painting "Nymph" by
Anatoli Avetianup.
Honestly speaking, let me be
completely honest and candid. When I look at a Sarayan, Guiragossian, Assadoor
or Carzou paintings, I do not see Armenian blood, Armenian churches decimated
by Turkish regiments, I do not see an Armenian Genocide. Simply, I see a
painting of a superior art quality, vibrant or intelligent colors, equilibrium
or rebellious strokes movements; a painting which could have been done by any
foreign artist who has never heard of the Armenian tragedy or learned one
single thing about the Armenian heritage. True! But, if you do not see it, you
feel it. And that is the greatness of the Armenian artists. You just feel it.
You are not supposed to see art as an object resting on a table, like a vase
or a bowl of fruits. You are not supposed to look at a piece of art with
uninformed and un-sensitive eyes. You do not look at art to discover it.
Simply, you do not look at art, you just feel it. Armenian art is not
stagnant. It is a take and a give and vice-versa. Armenian art as an
unchangeable witness of a bloody genocide and tragic facts, remains
independent and constantly in state of metamorphosis. To feel, understand and
fully absorb an Armenian art, one must be familiar with the elements that
constitute its very fabric, the message behind the painting, the meaning of
lights in an Armenian painting, the concept and symbols of the Katchkars,
the Diaspora essence and soul, and most definitely the national religious
fervor.
THE PIONEERS OF THE DIASPORA ART
I
will address the issue very candidly all along this essay. Together, we will
select some paintings and artists that are the best representatives of an
Armenian platform, an ideological plateau, a philosophical front and
consequently, we let the genre of the chosen artists, their colors and design
of their canvases tell us the whole story. An honest and truthful story that
poses all the questions and gives all the answers.
Painting, below: Ararat by Sarkissian
and art are twins. They were born together in the
same cradle. The cradle of the civilization at the dawn of the human race. At
the very dawn and sunset of the bronze age, in caves and fortresses, on trees
branches and savaged hills filled with skulls and bones, at the doors of
magnificent citadels, at the gates of invincible fortresses and at the feet of
mountains that witness the might of unmerciful formidable armies. From the
very beginning of
THE
PIONEERS:
MARTIROS SARAYAN
(1880-1972)
Martiros
Sarayan was born to a farmers
family near Rostov on Don, in the small Armenian populated town of Novy-
Nakhichevan. Martiros Saryan is my hero! This is a man of an utmost
integrity, an infinite goodness, a full devotion to his homeland and immense
affection toward others. He never sought fame or wealth. One single thought
was constantly on his mind “ARMENIA”. All his life, Martiros was obsessed and
possessed by the love of his country and the survival of his countrymen and
countrywomen. Early in his career, he established a name for himself in Russia
and got plenty of opportunities to leave his half destroyed and impoverished
country to the United States. Unlike his
MARTIROS SARAYAN

Photos
from L to R: #1. Flowers of Kalaki, 1914, by Martiros Sarayan.
With the coming of
Martiros Sarayan, Armenian art began to change and commenced to create its own
identity free of Russian and French art influence which have heavily dominated
the past era and deeply made its mark and put its signature on the work of
all the previous Armenian masters. Under the influence of his first travel
to the homeland of his fathers in 1901, Sarayan created a series of paintings
in pantheist spirit, " Mythology, Fantastic Visions, Fairy Tales and Dreams,"
artistically and psychologically influenced by Symbolism. He wanted to free
his style from foreign influences, Russian, Anatolian, French, you name it,
but, he was not totally immune. As the father of modern Armenian painting,
Sarayan while developing his painting style worked in all the newest art
venues, theories and most recent trends.
Photos
from L to R: #1. The Poet at the Feet of Aragats, 1906 by Martiros Sarayan.
#2. Near the Well, 1908 by Martiros Sarayan.
Sarayan was deeply influenced
and inspired by French masters of the era, notably the French Impressionists
such as Henri Matisse, Monet, Gauguin and many others with whom he created a
movement known as “THE BLUE ROSE GROUP” solely established to defend this new
style of painting and defending its credibility, artistic values and
legitimacy in the European communities, societies, salons, centers, milieux
and critics circles. Ironically enough, later on in Paris, Pablo Picasso and
Georges Braques will do the same thing by creating their own group to defend
their cubism movement and abstract art which were at the beginning of the dawn
of their creation extremely ridiculed in the society and press. At the
beginning of the Impressionism movement, nobody in the art world, art critic
circles and media would take this art form seriously. And to make it worse and
more difficult for those Impressionist artists, no gallery owner or museum
curator will exhibit their work. It was not recognized nor accepted. Saryan
was in the
INNOVATIVE CREATIVITY:
Photo:
The Settlement by Sarayan.
To his portraits,
Saryan added a perfect blend of nonchalant strokes of unconformity with
meticulous attention to details to project the most pleasant attributes of his
subjects, qualities and virtues such hope, happiness, strength, optimism and
self-assurance. His portraits would not sit there like a historical
reference or a representation of a human face that should look exactly how
others conceive it or expect it to appear to them, to history and to
evidential authenticity. Each of his portrait painting is a human drama, sad
or joyful, it still remain a human documentary rather than an appealing and
truthful reproduction of the physical traits of the model. You can feel the
person in his portraitures. This models do not sit or pose for him, they come
to him with a story to tell. This is so evident in the portraits of his
Holiness Katholikos Vazgen the First, the Russian melodramatic poet Lozinsky
and the Armenian dramatist and poet Avetik Isshakyan.
Major works:
Poet at the Foot of Aragats, 1906. By the Well. Hot Day, 1908. Flowers of
Kalaki, 1914. Street. Afternoon. Constantinopole, 1910. Egyptian Masks, 1911.
Night Landscape, 1911. Date Palm, 1911

CARZOU,
(1907-2000)
Photos from L to R: #1.Carzou. #2 By the Canal at Venice, 1975, by Carzou.
In 1925, he graduated from the Paris School of Architecture. In 1939, Carzou had his first one-man show in Paris and he took the City of Lights by storm. It did not take him longtime to become famous. He was innovative, visionary, romantic and most certainly very lucky. The French art communities loved him. So did the French government! In1 956 the President of France conferred upon him the highest honor and the highest medal in the country: “LA LEGION D’HONNEUR” (The Legion of Honor) knight title. In1979, Carzou was elected a member of The French Academy of Art. This superb artist brought Armenian contemporary art to its highest level. France in1920 was the second homeland to Armenian artists and the Mecca of Modern Armenian Art , particularly to a great number of Armenian artists in the Diaspora. Carzou was aware of that and demonstrated his gratitude by integrating his way of life and art in the Parisian's life style, its mood, fabrics and intellectualism. The name of CARZOU came as an illuminated revelation in 1953 with the presentation of his masterpiece "Giselle" at the Paris Opera and following the exhibition of his "Venetian Landscapes" in Paris. Two French museums bear the name of Carzou, one in Vence and the other in Manosque. The third will be opening soon in Yerevan, Armenia.
JANSEM
(Jan-Hovanes
Semerdjian-1920)


Photos
from L to R: Major works by Jansem. #1. The Market, 1973. #2. Homage to
Goya, 1978. #3. Claudius, 1978.

Kevork
Bachindjaghian is the undisputed founder of the Armenian “Paysagist” school.
He was deeply influenced by landscape sceneries he grew around and saw during
his childhood in Georgia, former state of the Soviet empire. The valley of
Alazan was particularly dear to him and served as a major source of
inspiration. He studied art at the Russian Academy of Fine Arts in St.
Petersburg. He received additional training in the studio of M. Klodt.
Photos
from L to R: #1. Island St. Lazarus by Night, 1894

Mount Ararat, 1911
Continues on the next page.